• 목록
• 답변
• 글쓰기
• 게시판 리스트 옵션
  • 수정
  • 삭제

Binance presents eight ranges of discount, with every stage requiring you to have a certain variety of BNB in your Binance account. So, those have just not been totally explored and i don’t assume there’s an actual resolution for that yet. So, we need to alter that, because we want to permit taproot, which implies permitting additionally input, particularly if we use MuSig2; we don’t need to reveal the inner keys. I believe this remains to be going to be different for later, and we are just going to be allowing any form of UTXO in your channel announcement that has to match the capability of the channel that you're announcing. I feel we’re going to stick to a easy model, the place you enable pointing to any sort of output to pay in your channel. For instance Visa said they were going to allow Bitcoin payments for 70M merchants. If the node later requests its funds be despatched to a distinct handle, its counterparty ought to refuse that request. So proper now, the best way channels are announced, it must be particular 2-of-2 multisig, appears to be like exactly like ln-penalty channels.

And there was an concept that instead of using the MuSig2 output, the commitment transaction, truly, the funding output would have each a keypath spend that would be MuSig2, but also a scriptpath spend that may use a plain, normal 2-of-2 multisig, so that all of the commitment transactions would use the scriptpath spend. This allows Bitcoin Core to pretty compare all transactions in the mempool based on their efficient feerate whether or not or not these transactions have any ancestors. Whenever new transactions are confirmed and added to the ledger, the network updates every user’s copy of the ledger to reflect the newest adjustments. Most forks are usually not contentious and are comparatively minor software updates. And cryptocurrency security may be achieved more with hardware wallets as compared to software wallets. So, if you wish to learn extra about that subject, it’s not too long, one thing like an hour or so, strolling by way of all the main points of that proposal.

We had an amazing podcast out in the Chaincode podcast, the place we talked to Elle Mouton and Oliver Gugger about simple taproot channels, which principally is that this proposal. Like a consequence, you may find yourself dressed as a ketchup bottle, handing out coupons for a low cost on the brand you’re wearing, or just wearing a poster. You and your mum would each must have a Bitcoin wallet (which is like an account), you’d want to search out a web based alternate (there are lots), you’d arrange an account linked to your bank account then buy the Bitcoins and send them to her wallet. Before taking possession of bitcoin, you must have a bitcoin wallet. Also, traders have an option to whitelist addresses and set up an anti-phishing code. This week’s e-newsletter describes a proposed BIP for creating signed messages for non-legacy addresses and summarizes a dialogue about provably burning small amounts of bitcoin for denial of service protection. The discussion is, how far ought to we go? The remainder appears okay to me, youtu.be actually, so far as complexity is concerned. I’d say, to me, I have some experience working. So I feel that’s, to me, the biggest red flag. And even with that one, I think we’ve ironed out nearly all the main points, and I think each LND and LDK have a first model, a primary prototype that is working virtually end-to-finish.

And this way, you don’t have to change nonces for the MuSig2 output and only the mutual closing and maybe the splices, in all probability the splices as nicely, would use the MuSig2 spend path. You need to persist it to disc, you have got to write it someplace, the place for those who have a look at like the MuSig API, they say don’t persist this. So, will we have to be protecting track of the UTXO truly not being moved while it is the stand-in to have announced the channel? And that could be nice, very nice for privateness, however it’s laborious to determine what the multiplier would be, it’s hard to determine how we will make the proofs and how we are going to guantee that the proofs can't be reused. Two-issue authentication is offered and is all the time a nice sight. And I’m curious how Lightning engineers are desirous about taproot and MuSig2 related channels and how the audience should suppose about their nearer term uses in Lightning, in distinction to something that I think quite a lot of Bitcoin hopefuls are interested by, which is Point Time Locked Contracts (PTLCs) involving schnorr signatures and adaptor signatures. So, you may level out any output that has sufficient funds to have mainly funded that channel; I assume that means enough or extra.